Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners approve Mountain View Estates subdivision with new easement and water-metering conditions
Summary
Carbon County commissioners approved the Mountain View Estates preliminary plat July 17, adding amended conditions that relocate county road easements to Lot 6, require 20-foot headgate access easements on specified lots, limit covenant changes without county permission, and require water metering at each lot.
The Carbon County Commissioners approved the Mountain View Estates Major Subdivision preliminary plat on July 17, adding several amended conditions to address access, irrigation limits and water monitoring.
Contract Planner Forrest Mandeville presented the subdivision and a supporting report from a hydrologic firm; consultant Rich Lobbe summarized on-site testing that included two wells (one pumped, one observation) and a 24-hour pump test. Lobbe reported that the 24-hour evaluation "surpassed the required water volume," noting a pumping rate of about 12 gallons per minute, and the report did not identify senior water-rights impacts requiring denial of the plat.
The commission amended multiple conditions tied to final plat approval. Commissioner Scott Blain moved to relocate existing County Road easements extending east of East River Road through Lots 7–10 and require abandonment and relocation to Lot 6 prior to final plat; the motion was seconded and carried. The board adopted specific language for condition #4 to provide 20-foot-wide, motorized-access easements for headgate users on the north side of Lots 1 and 2, the south side of Lots 15 and 16, the north side of Lots 17 and 18, and the south side of Lots 17 and 18 to ensure physical access to headgates.
Commissioner Scott Miller added language to condition #5 to prevent covenant amendments to irrigation prohibitions without county permission, and later amended condition #5b to require a water metering system at each lot; both amendments were seconded and carried. Planner Mandeville noted enforcement options include DNRC authority, civil suits by neighbors, or county-initiated legal action if conditions are violated. The commissioners also briefly discussed bridge canal maintenance and easement details.
Presiding Officer Scott Blain restated the motion to approve the subdivision with the project memorandum findings and the day's amendments; the motion passed. The meeting adjourned at 1:00 p.m.
