Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Wastewater Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Red Oak City Council authorizes $1.76 million engineering agreement for wastewater plant reconstruction

Red Oak City Council · August 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its Aug. 18 meeting the Red Oak City Council approved Resolution 2025-96 to hire Snyder & Associates for engineering work on a wastewater treatment plant reconstruction for $1,757,100; the council also approved a separate $46,500 flood resiliency study by JEO.

The Red Oak City Council on Aug. 18 approved a resolution authorizing Snyder & Associates to provide engineering services for the reconstruction of the city's wastewater treatment plant for $1,757,100.

The motion to approve Resolution 2025-96 was made by Councilperson Brian Bills and seconded by Councilperson Sharon Bradley; the council recorded a unanimous roll-call vote in favor. The resolution authorizes entering the agreement with Snyder & Associates for the engineering work as described in the motion.

At the same meeting the council also approved Resolution 2025-97, which authorizes JEO to carry out a Flood Resiliency Evaluation and Plan for $46,500. That motion was made by Councilperson Tim Fridolph and seconded by Councilperson Sharon Bradley, and it passed on a unanimous roll-call vote.

City officials did not record detailed discussion of the engineering scopes or a timeline for construction in the transcript. City Administrator Lisa Kotter noted a separate administrative report during the meeting about a planned software conversion; no funding changes tied to the engineering agreements were recorded in the meeting minutes provided.

The council approved both agreements as formal actions during the Aug. 18 meeting; follow-up steps, contract execution dates and project schedules were not specified in the meeting record.

The council adjourned at 7:16 p.m.