Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council sends TIG Distribution incentive proposal back for more detail after jobs clarification
Summary
Council asked staff to return a proposed tax-increment financing package for TIG Distribution after company representatives clarified the plan retains about 50 existing Marshalltown jobs rather than creating 50 new positions; councilmembers pressed staff for a side-by-side comparison with a tax abatement before final action.
Councilmembers voted to send back a proposed development agreement offering tax-increment financing (TIF) to TIG Distribution after hearing company and staff clarifications about the project’s job impact.
Whitney Schmidt, senior HR business partner for TIG, told the council the proposal’s 50-job figure reflects retention of about 50 existing Marshalltown employees, not net new hires. "It is actually just retaining the 50 employees that we employ here in Marshalltown," Schmidt said, describing the expansion as consolidation of operations into a 90,000-square-foot addition at the company’s Rex Ryden Road site.
City staff and economic-development advocates framed the incentive as necessary to keep TIG in Marshalltown. John Hall of the Marshalltown Area Chamber of Commerce said competing sites and nearby markets make incentives part of keeping specialized operations local. "To continue operating in Marshalltown ... we need to close that gap and come to a number that works for the company," Hall said, noting TIG’s planned $15 million private investment and the city’s proposed minimum assessment of roughly $9.55 million.
Council members repeatedly asked whether a standard industrial tax abatement would achieve the same result at lower cost to taxpayers. Staff explained the TIF rebate structure would deliver a larger near-term rebate that the company said it needed to make the consolidation feasible. Councilmember Nichols and others asked for a formal side-by-side comparison of the fiscal costs and benefits of the TIF development agreement versus a tax abatement schedule before the council votes on the incentive.
After discussion, a motion to return the incentive as a resolution for later council action passed 5–2. The council directed staff to prepare comparative fiscal models and clarified that the present proposal documents retention commitments rather than guaranteed new positions. The city will revisit the proposal in a future meeting once the staff analysis is complete.
Next steps: staff will provide a comparative analysis of a TIF rebate versus a tax abatement and return language for a formal resolution and vote.
