Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Alcohol License topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Waukesha committee delays Q Club license decision amid dispute over $10,000 reserve fee
Summary
The Waukesha Ordinance and Licensing Committee on Nov. 11 postponed action on an application from Q Club of Wisconsin after staff said the filing appeared to require a $10,000 reserve Class B liquor license. Applicants and a commercial broker argued the sale should transfer the existing license; the committee agreed to reconvene before the next council meeting to resolve the issue or accept the fee.
The Waukesha City Ordinance and Licensing Committee on Nov. 11 paused consideration of an application from Q Club of Wisconsin after staff said the paperwork indicated the applicant had marked pricing for a transfer rather than filing the required reserve Class B application, which carries a $10,000 fee.
A Clerk's Office representative read guidance from the Wisconsin Department of Revenue, saying in part: “licenses may be transferred only as follows” and listing narrow circumstances (relocation, court-appointed receiver or trustee in bankruptcy, personal representative or surviving spouse after death, disability with spouse compliance, or partner succession). The clerk said the current submission appeared to be a person-to-person transfer that did not match those DOR conditions and asked the applicants to provide evidence if they believed that interpretation was incorrect.
Devin Peel, of 1st Weber Group Commercial, disputed the clerk’s interpretation. Peel told the committee the applicants are buying an existing, operating business and that “we've done this hundreds of times all over the state,” adding that a recent local sale had been handled as a transfer. Peel urged staff to re-check the Department of Revenue guidance or accept the transfer rather than require a new reserve license.
Committee members said they understood the applicants’ urgency — several speakers raised the potential impact on employees if approval was delayed — but that staff were following DOR guidance and the committee could not make a unilateral legal determination at the meeting. The Clerk's Office said it would correct any misapplication if applicants provide documentation or an official DOR ruling showing a different interpretation.
As a compromise, the committee and applicants agreed to meet at 5:30 p.m. on the Tuesday before the next council meeting to resolve the paperwork. If the applicants present evidence that the DOR guidance has been misapplied, staff said they will correct the filing; if not, applicants indicated they would be prepared to pay the $10,000 reserve fee to avoid delays. No formal vote was taken on Q Club’s application during the Nov. 11 meeting.
The committee recorded the matter as postponed to a special committee meeting; the item is expected to appear on the subsequent council consent agenda if resolved beforehand.
