Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board sets July 7 vote on proposed spay/neuter ordinance after weeks of debate; volunteers press for stronger enforcement and higher breeder fees

Monterey County Board of Supervisors · June 23, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board introduced an ordinance to require spaying/neutering of dogs and cats in unincorporated Monterey County (with exemptions), set a July 7, 2026 adoption hearing, and directed staff to return with a proposed breeders‑permit fee and clarifications on enforcement. Animal-welfare advocates urged stronger penalties and expanded feral‑cat TNR support.

Monterey County supervisors introduced a proposed ordinance June 23 that would require spaying and neutering of dogs and cats in the unincorporated county, create an unaltered‑animal certification and a breeders permit, and establish a phased enforcement regime with correction notices followed by administrative citations and fines.

Key provisions presented by Health and Animal Services staff include: - Mandatory spaying of female dogs older than six months and neutering for male dogs and cats older than five months unless an unaltered‑animal certificate or veterinarian‑signed medical exemption is obtained; - Creation of a breeders permit (one‑year renewable authorization) with recordkeeping and advertising disclosure requirements; - Exemptions for law‑enforcement working animals, documented medical exemptions, temporary visitors, and limited allowances for responsible caretakers with unaltered animals under specified conditions; and - An enforcement ladder: a correction notice and 60 days to cure, then administrative citations with increasing maximum fines (staff proposed administrative fines after repeated violations).

The board set July 7 at 10:30 a.m. for final consideration and adoption and directed staff to return with specific fee proposals for the breeders permit and clarify penalty language and the enforcement path so that a final ordinance will not be left without a fee mechanism.

Public testimony was lengthy and pointed. Rescue groups, shelter staff and TNR volunteers largely supported a spay/neuter law and urged stronger feral‑cat provisions, higher breeder fees and clearer TNR authorization (trap‑neuter‑return). Several speakers cited Seaside’s ordinance and local low‑cost spay clinics as effective models; shelter workers said mandatory sterilization helps reduce shelter intake and euthanasia numbers. Volunteers asked for more enforcement teeth for repeat backyard breeders and a higher breeders permit fee to deter commercial backyard operations.

Supervisors asked staff to correct typographical inconsistencies in the draft, to ensure the ordinance’s penalties align with county code and to prepare a fee schedule (breeder permit, administrative processing) to come back before the board. The board approved introduction and set July 7 for final action.

What’s next: Staff will prepare a fee schedule and clarify enforcement language and return to the board for adoption on July 7, 2026; staff also will continue working with Hitchcock Road Animal Services on TNR and low‑cost spay options.