Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Discipline Language Access topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board hears allegation that students were disciplined for speaking Spanish; administration pledges review

Hazleton Area School District Board of Directors · June 25, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A board member relayed a student's allegation that a school had previously suspended or disciplined students for speaking Spanish; the board asked administration to investigate and said it would review and report back confidentially.

During discussion of comprehensive plans for the career center and related items (114–115), a board member raised a complaint reported by a student that children at a school referenced as Mac A Doore (middle) had been disciplined — previously suspended or kept after school — for speaking Spanish.

Board members pressed the administration for clarification. One board member asked the superintendent to share, confidentially, the names of any students disciplined so the matter could be investigated; the administration responded that it did not have identifiable names in hand but said it would investigate the allegation. A district official told the board that the reported practice had been modified so that students were not currently suspended but in some cases had been kept after school.

The board and administration differed in emphasis about how to interpret a single student's report versus systemic evidence. A board member said the district should set the record straight; others cautioned about drawing firm conclusions from one account. The superintendent (or district leadership) said they would look into the matter and report back.

The allegation was raised as part of a broader debate over curriculum and accountability in items 109–122; the board approved the grouped items (with two 'no' votes on 114 and 115) but requested follow‑up on the discipline claim and on the comprehensive plan’s stakeholder engagement.

The record does not show any formal disciplinary case names released at the meeting; board members asked that any investigation respect confidentiality while clarifying the facts.