Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Electric Motorcycles topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council holds first reading of ordinance to regulate electric motorcycles
Summary
On first reading, staff said the proposed ordinance would define electric motorcycles distinct from e‑bikes and mopeds, restrict use on sidewalks and trails, set equipment and operator requirements, and create penalties to improve enforcement and public safety.
The Enumclaw City Council conducted a first reading on June 22 of Ordinance No. 2839, a municipal code amendment intended to regulate electric motorcycles, including high‑powered electric dirt bikes that city staff say have been increasingly operated on streets, sidewalks and multi‑use trails.
"These vehicles are often marketed as recreational or off‑road use devices, but are frequently operated on public streets, sidewalks, and multi‑use trails within city limits," the Chief (speaker 11) told council in a staff report. He said Enumclaw's municipal code does not currently distinguish electric motorcycles from e‑bikes and mopeds, creating uncertainty for riders and enforcement.
The staff proposal would define electric motorcycles by power output, speed capability and design; restrict operation on sidewalks, parks and multi‑use trails unless specifically authorized; require helmets consistent with state law; establish minimum lighting and safety equipment for roadway use; set operator requirements such as a valid driver's license for roadway operation; and provide enforcement options including warnings, citations and vehicle impoundment for repeat or egregious violations.
The Chief cited recent state legislation (referred to in the staff report as "gross substitute senate bill 6110") and noted a Department of Licensing work group with an October 2027 due date for state regulations. He said the ordinance is intended to complement state law and provide local clarity where state definitions are absent.
This was a first reading by title only; council did not vote to adopt the ordinance on June 22. Staff recommended adoption at a later meeting, and councilmembers were reminded that additional comment is allowed before second reading. The council's public‑safety committee previously discussed the issue and indicated an education push on e‑bikes and related devices would be part of enforcement work.
Next steps: the ordinance proceeds to a second reading (date not specified at the June 22 meeting), where council may amend or adopt the measure.
