Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Revenue Measures topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sarasota board weighs revenue options: facility rentals, fingerprinting, activity fees and meal-price changes
Summary
District staff proposed four modest revenue measures — raising facility rental rates, revising fingerprinting/volunteer fee recovery after AHCA changes, charging activity fees for non-enrolled participants, and modest meal-price increases — and recommended further study on equity and operational impacts before any board action.
District staff presented four areas for possible additional revenue or cost-recovery and asked the board to direct further study and public discussion.
On facility rentals, Superintendent Conner said the district’s Facilitron rates are low compared with peer counties and recommended staff study raising rates for gyms, auditoriums, cafeterias and fields to better cover custodial and utility costs.
Chief Overbay described the state-mandated transition of employee and volunteer background checks into the AHCA/FDLE clearinghouse and the district’s current cost exposures: the district pays $60 for each current employee fingerprinted and staff estimated about 4,365 employees remain to be processed (roughly $261,900; total district expense above $300,000). Overbay also reported the district’s processing cost for a level‑2 volunteer is about $102 while the district currently charges volunteers $30, producing a per‑volunteer subsidy of about $64.
“We still have about 4,300 employees that still need to be fingerprinted,” Overbay said, noting the district is organizing on-site sessions to complete the work by the June 2027 clearinghouse deadline.
On activity fees, staff noted Florida’s recent Senate Bill 538 allows districts to charge non‑enrolled participants for athletics and other activities — up to $400 per sport — and staff reported roughly 200 out‑of‑district participants currently use district athletics. The team suggested multiple fee-structure options, including charging only non‑district students or applying a modest universal participation fee, and urged more data and hardship‑waiver planning before any implementation.
Finally, staff proposed modest student meal-price increases (examples given: elementary lunch from $3.25 to $3.65; secondary from $3.75 to $4.15) to reduce general-fund transfers into food-service operations, while noting the ALICE household data and free/reduced eligibility make any increase an equity-sensitive decision.
Board members expressed particular concern about fingerprinting and volunteer costs' impact on community engagement and said non‑profit partnerships and targeted subsidies merit exploration. Staff recommended a dedicated workshop to refine options and public outreach before adopting any fee changes.
