Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Police Equipment Procurement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Carpentersville trustees introduce resolution on body‑worn and in‑car cameras; agenda approved unanimously

Carpentersville Board of Trustees · June 22, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the June 22 Carpentersville Board of Trustees meeting a trustee introduced a resolution to authorize a contract for body‑worn cameras, an in‑car camera system and TASER 10 devices with evidence‑management integration; the board approved the meeting agenda by roll call and then adjourned. No separate vote on the resolution is recorded.

The Carpentersville Board of Trustees met at 6:00 p.m. on June 22, 2026. During new business a trustee proposed a resolution to authorize a contract to purchase body‑worn cameras, an in‑car camera system and TASER 10 devices that integrate with an evidence‑management system; the transcript does not record a separate roll‑call vote on that resolution.

Trustee Garcia moved to approve the meeting agenda and Trustee Abbott seconded. The board then took a roll‑call vote: Trustees Garcia, Gross, Malone, Van Schaack (President), Abbott and Lucero each voted yes and the presiding officer announced, "Motion carries." The agenda contained the introduced resolution listed as item A under new business.

No additional discussion of contract price, vendor selection, funding source or implementation timeline is recorded in the transcript. After approving the agenda, a motion to adjourn was made, seconded and approved by voice vote. The meeting ended with no further recorded action on the introduced resolution.

Because the transcript records only an introduction of the resolution and the board's approval of the agenda that included that item, it is not possible from this record to report whether the board later debated or formally approved the procurement request; such votes or staff reports are "not specified" in the transcript.