Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Realm And Frontage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Advisers push for pedestrian safety, bike separation and park connections in Langston Boulevard frontage planning
Summary
On June 23 LRPC discussed frontage treatments for the 1401 Langston Boulevard site: commissioners and advisory groups urged separated bike/ped facilities, minimized conflicts between loading/parking and the Custis Trail, underground vehicle access, and stronger coordination with National Park Service on the green buffer.
Frontage treatments and public‑realm design were a central focus of the June 23 Long Range Planning Committee meeting on the 1401 Langston Boulevard study, with many advisory groups urging ambitious pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure and careful design of vehicle and service access.
Staff framed the question as an urban‑edge trade‑off: pushing buildings to the street creates "eyes on the park" and activation, while setting buildings back can yield plazas and green buffers but requires more programming to stay active. The applicant described a fan‑shaped configuration that places slender towers to create separation, a large publicly accessible park, a forested promenade along the National Park Service edge and widened sidewalks with separated bike lanes on Langston Boulevard.
Several speakers urged the county and applicant to prioritize cyclist and pedestrian safety at trail crossings. "I appreciate the fact that you mentioned that there's all this underground parking, but I don't know how the vehicles are going to reach that without crossing the Custis Trail," said Steve Affeldt of the Bicycle Advisory Committee, noting the trail’s heavy commuter volume. Staff replied the design intends to concentrate garage and loading access away from Langston Boulevard and minimize at‑grade conflicts.
Community members and commissioners also encouraged the applicant to partner with the National Park Service to address invasive species and preserve the forested buffer; several participants said additional publicly accessible parkland adjacent to Gateway Park would be a community benefit. Public commenter Peter Rousselot urged independent economic and transportation analyses to quantify bonus‑density value and transportation impacts and suggested the county set aside funds for outside experts.
Ending: Staff will use tonight’s guidance to refine frontage scenarios and coordinate technical analyses for fall modeling and future LRPC review.
