Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Connectivity Parking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sidewalk connectivity, parking and EV readiness surface as top local concerns at Enfield Laramie Farm hearing
Summary
Local residents at the Enfield Planning Board hearing raised concerns about pedestrian connectivity to Route 4, public parking near conservation areas, and potential traffic on Maple Street. Developer proposes banked parking, condo-doc controls for exterior lighting and says the site is EV‑ready.
Questions about pedestrian connections, parking and on‑site amenities drew sustained comment from board members and neighbors during the hearing on the Laramie Farm project.
Board member Eric Russell and several residents emphasized the importance of meaningful sidewalk connectivity from the development to the town network and the school along Route 4. Developers said they are coordinating with the New Hampshire Department of Transportation on driveway and left‑turn pocket geometry and that right‑of‑way constraints and utility locations may limit where sidewalks can be installed. The developer said they will continue to pursue feasible options and asked for more time to work out DOT permitting details.
On parking, Verdant noted RSA constraints limiting municipal requirements and flagged that the applicant’s submitted plan shows roughly 1.7 parking stalls per dwelling unit; the plan also includes 87 ‘banked’ spaces that can be surfaced later if demand warrants (reducing the immediate counted ratio to about 1.5 spaces per unit if banked spaces are excluded). The applicant said townhouse units typically include garage parking and that apartment garages will be able to accommodate EV charging infrastructure.
Residents asked if the emergency access road and gated entrances would allow public parking and access to trails on conservation land. The developer and several board members said public parking adjacent to the gated emergency access raises privacy and management concerns; the board reached consensus not to require public parking in that location but asked the applicant to provide a final gate/access plan and to confirm emergency‑service access procedures.
Lighting and amenity management were also discussed. Verdant recommended the board require compliance with Enfield’s lighting standards (full‑cutoff fixtures, limits on uplighting and trespass); the applicant said condo documents will require consistent exterior fixtures and management of outdoor lighting while acknowledging interior unit lighting is difficult to regulate.
The board will require a construction traffic management plan to limit heavy construction traffic during school drop‑off/pick‑up and to minimize use of Maple Street as a primary construction route. The applicant agreed to provide a CTMP and to phase traffic as needed.
The planning board and applicant agreed to continue the hearing after Verdant reviews the written plan responses and staff issues a zoning compliance memorandum.
