Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board continues Maple Street hearing; applicant says septic permit won’t be used if sewer installed
Summary
The Enfield Planning Board continued a hearing on a proposed Maple Street development to July 22, 2026, after discussing how density is calculated in R1 zoning and whether a recently issued septic permit for four units would be used. The applicant said it plans to connect the units to municipal sewer paid for by the project; the board also tabled several agenda items and confirmed upcoming meetings.
The Enfield Planning Board voted to continue its review of a proposed development near Maple Street to July 22, 2026, after members sought clarification on density calculations in the R1 district and raised questions about a recently issued septic permit for four units.
Why it matters: Board members said the way unit density is calculated in the R1 zone appears different from R3 and R5 rules, a distinction that could change how many units are allowed. The applicant’s decision to use municipal sewer rather than an already‑issued septic permit affects both density and compliance questions and prompted the board to request a formal compliance determination from the zoning administrator.
A committee member opened the discussion by saying the R1 district does not allow the same density calculation used in R3 and R5 and that “the calculations need to be thought about” to ensure consistent application across districts. The exchange prompted members to agree they would request a compliance determination from the zoning administrator to resolve unit‑count and density questions before taking further action.
On the septic permit, one participant asked whether a permit granted on April 10 for four units off Maple Street would bind the project if the town later extends sewer. Carl, speaking for the project, said the intention is to extend municipal sewer to Maple Street at the project’s expense and connect those four units to sewer. “It’s permitted … but we don’t plan on acting on it,” Carl said of the septic permit, adding the team is pursuing design and permitting for sewer rather than implementing the septic system.
Board members also flagged a possible wetlands setback problem in the septic layout: a participant noted the required setback is 75 feet but that the prior plan placed the septic roughly 50 feet from wetlands and asked staff to recheck the layout if sewer extension does not proceed.
Transportation and permitting questions came from resident Robert Bredland Field, who asked whether a DOT driveway permit had been issued. Carl said the DOT has approved the first step of the traffic study and the mitigation at the project entrance, and the project is moving to driveway design.
After discussion of next steps and follow‑up work, the board voted on several procedural motions. The board moved to continue the hearing to July 22, 2026, to allow the applicant time for follow‑up actions; a roll‑call vote recorded affirmative votes from Ben, Eric, Tim, Paul, Bill and David (recorded on the meeting record). The board also voted to table agenda items 3 through 9 for this meeting to preserve time for the hearing.
During public comments the board accepted a participant’s offer to submit a written report and asked staff (Rob) to distribute that addendum to members prior to the continued hearing. The board confirmed its next regular meeting on July 8, 2026, and the continued hearing date.
The meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m.
