Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Project Financing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Good Thunder seeks financing options for major water project; municipal advisor to produce cash-flow analysis
Summary
A municipal advisor outlined bridge-financing options, PFA timing and grant opportunities for the proposed multi-million-dollar water/wastewater project; the advisor will send an engagement letter and a project cash-flow analysis to help the council decide scope and funding mix.
The Good Thunder City Council received an overview of financing options for an anticipated large water/wastewater project and agreed to receive a project cash-flow analysis from a municipal-advising firm.
A representative of David Drown & Associates, who described the firm's role in public finance, told the council the firm helps small communities with temporary financing during design and with accessing state and federal grants and loans. "I've for 25 years I've worked for David Drown and Associates. We serve cities, counties, and townships in Minnesota in public finance," the advisor said, describing programs that can bridge design costs until PFA or other long-term funding is available.
The advisor outlined three near-term funding tracks the council is pursuing: the state appropriation process (state bonding), the Public Facilities Authority (PFA) intended-use-plan application (the firm said it would submit PFA paperwork on the city's behalf on June 1), and a federal congressional directed-spending request that has staff support in Congress. He cautioned that PFA grant/loan shares depend on affordability calculations tied to median-household income and LMI percentages, and cited a commonly used PFA affordability example of roughly $136 per month for a water user as a threshold illustration.
On temporary financing, the advisor described Minnesota Rural Water programs (micro and midi loans) that can be used to bridge costs before long-term funding closes and noted pre-negotiated fee schedules designed for small communities. He also described how temporary-loan interest can be covered by long-term loan closing under some programs.
The advisor said his team would deliver a project cash-flow analysis and funding-scenario matrix that models the enterprise funds' operating cash, likely bond payments, and possible rate impacts. That analysis will help the council decide whether to change scope, pursue additional grant opportunities, or move forward as designed.
The advisor also said he would send an engagement letter required by his federal license that documents his obligation to act in the city's financial interest; he stressed the engagement letter does not obligate the city to a paid contract: "It doesn't obligate you to hire or pay us to do anything," he said. Council members discussed wanting a short, no-fee analysis to start and indicated support for receiving the advisor's materials and an analysis before voting on significant commitments.
No formal, binding borrowing decision or long-term loan agreement was made at the meeting; council direction was limited to requesting the advisor's analysis and related materials.
