Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Police Facility topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chisago City Council weighs remodel of Lindstrom facility against new police building, directs staff to continue talks with Lindstrom
Summary
Chisago City Council reviewed cost and financing options for police facilities on June 8, weighing remodeling Lindstrom City Hall against building a new facility on Chisago City property. The council asked staff for more information and directed further discussions with Lindstrom; no formal action was taken.
Get email alerts on the Police Facility topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chisago City Council on June 8 reviewed cost estimates and financing scenarios for the city’s police facility needs and directed staff to continue talks with neighboring Lindstrom about a possible new facility arrangement. City Administrator John Pechman presented estimates and financing options, and council members discussed remodeling Lindstrom City Hall versus constructing a new police facility on Chisago City property.
Pechman told the council that two primary options were under consideration: renovating the existing Lindstrom City Hall facility to meet police needs or building a new, standalone police facility on Chisago City land. He also presented cost comparisons showing that operating an independent police department would substantially increase annual police-related expenses beyond building operating costs; specific dollar figures and projected annual debt-payment amounts were discussed in the presentation but are not specified in the minutes.
Chief of Police Bill Schlumbohm said revisions to the proposed remodel—specifically adding a garage and a sally port—would meet the department’s operational needs if the council pursues renovation rather than new construction. Council members pressed on renovation logistics and risks, noting concerns about potential cost overruns, who would bear responsibility for overruns, and expenses and disruption tied to temporarily relocating operations during construction.
Members also discussed the city’s current debt capacity and a range of possible financing approaches, including bond scenarios and cost-sharing arrangements with Lindstrom. Several council members expressed interest in exploring a new building option that could include shared ownership or contributions, subject to further negotiation and legal/contract protections.
The council requested additional information on cost breakdowns, financing scenarios, and renovation logistics before making a final determination. Council members directed staff to continue discussions with Lindstrom about a potential new building option and possible funding scenarios; the workshop concluded without any formal action or adopted motion.
The city administrator and staff will return with more detailed cost estimates and financing options for council consideration at a future meeting.
