Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Pavilion Restrooms topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Gaylord council gives staff direction to pursue pavilion restroom design and grants

City of Gaylord City Council · May 7, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council directed staff to pursue architectural drawings and possible grant funding for a small 16x16 restroom addition at Oaks Lakeside Pavilion after a design reviewer signaled such an addition would likely be approved if it preserves the building's historic features.

Council members directed staff to move forward with design work and to pursue grant funding for a proposed two‑restroom addition at the Oaks Lakeside Pavilion, while emphasizing the need to maintain the structure's historic integrity.

Staff described a concept drawing for a 16‑by‑16 addition with two unisex restrooms and said a design reviewer at the Minnesota Historic Preservation Office indicated the project would likely be considered favorably if it preserved key elements: keep existing windows in place behind a ledger board rather than removing them, avoid changing roof monitor lines and retain under‑panel roof components. Staff said some adjustments—such as planning for future removal of the restrooms—could be included to preserve the building's original appearance.

Staff noted the small matching legacy grant program administered by the historical society (matching grants up to $20,000) and said the next feasible application round would be early July; the deadline for an earlier round had already passed. Council also discussed temporary options for restroom trailers for large events and agreed that event renters should generally be responsible for trailer costs.

Council members asked staff to prepare stamped architectural drawings (the building inspector indicated drawings would be required) and to investigate whether local architect Hagen Miller could prepare plans suitable for later stamping. Staff said SEH would oversee aspects of the project and that the city would return with drawings and a plan before soliciting bids.

Council direction was to continue planning and apply for the July grant round if feasible, prepare the required architectural drawings, and bring a draft for council review before proceeding to bidding or construction.