Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Drive Throughs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission reviews stricter standards for drive‑throughs, stacking and lane limits amid walkability concerns
Summary
The commission debated whether growing numbers of drive‑throughs and kiosks reduce walkability; options discussed included limiting allowed zones, capping lane counts (single‑lane preferred), requiring stacking capacity, and imposing higher design/CUP standards for new drive‑throughs.
Commissioners spent substantial time on June 18 discussing how the draft Development Code should treat drive‑through facilities, saying the city needs to balance market demand with long‑term walkability goals.
Several members said recent trends — kiosks with minimal indoor space and multi‑lane drive‑throughs — are reducing opportunities for future pedestrian‑oriented development. "We already have so much land dedicated to drive‑throughs," Vice Chair Mead said. Commissioners proposed a suite of policy responses: restrict drive‑throughs in certain zoning districts; adopt higher design and CUP standards (examples cited from Indio); limit lane counts (single‑lane preferred) and require stacking space (the draft suggests eight vehicles for food/beverage drive‑throughs).
Staff noted existing draft standards already include stacking minimums and other dimensional rules but agreed to return with clearer language and possible alternatives — for example, enhanced standards for drive‑throughs in mixed‑use or downtown areas versus existing parking‑lot conversions. The commission asked staff to prepare model language that could be applied either through the allowable‑use tables or via enhanced CUP findings so council can weigh economic development implications against walkability objectives.
The commission did not take a formal vote; members asked staff to provide examples and draft options for limits on lanes and siting restrictions for future meetings.
