Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council orders Casa 21 realignment project; landowners object to proposed assessments
Summary
City engineer presented the Casa 21 realignment as a roughly $3.8 million county-led project with Gaylord’s share about $435,000. The council ordered preparation of plans; several nearby landowners objected to proposed special assessments on 10 acres east of Casa 21, saying assessments diminish potential benefits and raise concerns about future annexation and eminent-domain pressure.
The Gaylord City Council voted to order plans for the Casa 21 improvement project after a public hearing in which staff outlined the scope, costs and proposed special assessments.
Justin Black, the project manager with Short Elliott Hendrickson, described the realignment, drainage improvements and a new stormwater pond. He said the project’s total estimated cost is about $3.8 million, with Sibley County covering most of the cost and the city’s share at roughly $435,000 (about 12% of the total). The city’s portion includes stormwater work (~$354,000), water-main casing and limited water-main work.
Black explained the assessment methodology: stormwater costs are attributed based on contributing drainage areas and that some parcels east of Casa 21 would receive deferred assessments until annexation occurs. He said an estimated $340,000 would be assessed as part of the city’s contribution and that final assessment amounts will be recalculated after bids are opened.
At the public hearing, landowner Lisonbee Newbarth said the proposed assessment on a 10-acre parcel effectively erodes the land’s value and warned it would make the land unattractive to farmers and developers alike. “This assessment puts the city in a favorable position to purchase these 10 acres in the future,” Newbarth said, adding she felt the city did not disclose the assessment risk when an earlier parcel sale occurred.
A second resident, Patty Grogo, asked whether the county would also assess the land and whether interest would begin to accrue immediately; staff responded assessments would be made only by the city and that interest would not accrue until the property is annexed.
Council subsequently approved a resolution ordering the improvement and preparation of plans and scheduled a 90% plan review with county and city staff. Staff said plans will be submitted to State Aid and that the council will review final plans and assessments in February, followed by bid opening in early March and construction next summer.
The approval authorizes staff to prepare plans and a future assessment hearing will present final assessment amounts after bids are received.
