Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Learn And Earn topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pittsburgh council approves expansion of Learn and Earn youth program amid debate over Stop the Violence spending process

Pittsburgh City Council · June 24, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council approved a $1 million match to a Richard King Mellon Foundation grant to pilot a year‑round expansion of the Learn and Earn youth employment program, while some members pressed for a formal allocation plan and raised concerns about limits on staff spending from the Stop the Violence fund.

Council members voted to advance a plan to expand the city’s Learn and Earn youth employment program, approving authority for up to $1 million to match a grant from the Richard King Mellon Foundation and pilot a year‑round, two‑track program for 16–17‑year‑olds and 18–23‑year‑olds.

Matt Singer, deputy chief of staff to the mayor, told the Human Resources committee the pilot "would expand the program from just being a summer program to a year‑round program" and said participants would receive paid work experience paired with training and career‑relevant credentials. The proposal would fund placements with both institutional and private employers and aims to connect younger participants with basic workplace skills while older participants receive job‑specific training.

The vote followed extensive discussion of where the match money should come from and how the city should manage larger, unallocated balances in the Stop the Violence account. Council President Lavell said he would vote in favor but used his remarks to press a procedural point: that an "annual allocation plan" required by prior legislation has not been approved and that the council and administration need clearer rules on spending priorities and limits on staff costs. "I'm not speaking to the worthiness of the spend," Lavell said, "I'm speaking to my personal concern over we're actually not following the process." (Council President Lavell)

Council members asked administration officials to clarify operational details; Singer confirmed the pilot would run on two tracks, with the younger track focused on exposure and soft skills and the older track on credentialing and pathways to employment. Council members also sought information on wages and employer participation; Singer said he would follow up with detailed hourly‑wage information.

Supporters argued the expansion leverages foundation funding to increase placements and provide structured opportunities that council members and community groups have repeatedly requested. Several council members, including Councilwoman Warwick and Councilman Mosley, emphasized the tight timelines many community providers face and the need to take advantage of outside matching funds. Critics urged caution on governance and spending oversight, noting the fund contains substantial unallocated dollars and that prior constraints limited the proportion of funds used for staffing.

After the discussion, the committee issued an affirmative recommendation on the measure and the council advanced the authorization. The legislation authorizes the mayor and relevant department heads to execute agreements necessary to carry out the match and the year‑round pilot; any final contract execution will follow standard procurement and council authorization procedures.