Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Electronic Voting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Select Board adopts amendment to make electronic tally the ordinary Town Meeting method; funding advanced
Summary
After extended debate about moderator discretion, transparency, staffing, and costs, the Select Board amended Article 34 to make an electronic tally the ordinary method for Town Meeting votes and moved a $30,000 funding article forward to rent or purchase equipment.
The Danvers Select Board on April 7 adopted an amendment to Article 34 specifying that voting at Town Meeting shall ordinarily be conducted by a counted vote using an electronic tally and system, while preserving the Moderator’s discretion to use alternative methods when appropriate. The amendment was proposed by Select Board Member Michael Bean and adopted unanimously; the Board then moved the article as amended with a favorable recommendation.
Board members debated whether electronic voting should replace voice and standing votes or supplement them, noting statutory and practical considerations for a Representative Town Meeting—specifically that individual vote records must be publicly available under that structure. Town Manager Jill Cahill and legal counsel briefed members on operational questions. Estimated per-night vendor and staffing costs were cited at roughly $7,000 and additional staff time; the Town Manager and IT staff recommended renting equipment due to infrequent use and rapid technology changes.
Select Board Member Bean’s adopted Section 6 language includes: "Voting shall ordinarily be conducted by a counted vote using an electronic tally and system (\"the electronic system\"), which may be used: (a) by itself to reflect the vote; or (b) in conjunction with a voice vote." The amendment also preserves alternative methods—voice vote, counted standing vote, written ballot, or roll-call poll—at the Moderator’s discretion.
The Board also moved Article 35, a funding article to allocate $30,000 from free cash to rent or purchase electronic voting equipment, by a 4-1 vote (Trask opposed). The motion included discussion that operational costs (additional staffing) should be handled through the town’s operating budget rather than the one-time free-cash article.
Town Meeting Member Lauren Steeves told the Board that Town Meeting has authority to determine its voting methods and said other towns’ experience suggests electronic voting need not lengthen meetings and can improve accuracy and accountability. Supporters argued electronic voting modernizes process and increases transparency; some members cautioned about staffing needs, costs, and the risk of lengthening routine business if electronic voting is used for all items.
Next steps: Article 34 will appear on the Town Meeting warrant as amended; Article 35 will seek free-cash funding at Town Meeting.
