Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Inclusionary Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Danvers Affordable Housing Trust reviews finance report, debates inclusionary payment mechanics
Summary
At its March 18 meeting the Danvers Affordable Housing Trust reviewed recent expenditures and discussed how inclusionary payments and fractional-unit calculations work, noting a $28,000 example fee for one net unit and state concerns that a 12.5% inclusionary requirement may be high.
Get email alerts on the Inclusionary Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Danvers Affordable Housing Trust reviewed its Finance Report at a March 18 meeting and discussed how the town calculates inclusionary payments when developers provide fractional obligations instead of full units.
Members noted recent expenditures including a $49,999 contract for an initial Housing Production Plan bid and a $303,000 payment tied to the New England Homes for the Deaf project; the Trust also authorized an additional $5,600 for consultant presentations to town boards. The report was reviewed but not voted on because the treasurer was absent.
Trust members described how fractional obligations under the Inclusionary Housing Bylaw are calculated and discussed a payment example: for a net gain of one unit the fee works out to roughly $28,000. Members said some developers prefer to deliver on-site affordable units rather than pay a fee, and the Trust expressed preference for provided units when feasible. Members also observed that units at 50% of area median income (AMI) tend to lease quickly, while 80% AMI units often remain vacant or require subsidy.
The Trust discussed whether to build additional flexibility into inclusionary requirements to incentivize deeper affordability rather than strict unit counts. Members also noted feedback from the state on the Town’s MBTA Communities submission raising that a 12.5% inclusionary requirement may be considered high.
Procedural note: the Trust approved the minutes of its Feb. 18 meeting before the finance discussion; no formal vote was taken on the Finance Report itself.
