Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews self-appraisal, sets direction for measurable goals and requests assessment training
Summary
Trustees reviewed a compiled board self-appraisal, noted mixed responses on measurable goals and public-comment procedures, and asked staff for clearer assessment presentations and a fall training on interpreting student-performance data.
Wetzel County Schools trustees reviewed the results of a board self-appraisal and discussed next steps for goal-setting and data literacy.
The compiled self-appraisal showed unanimous or near-unanimous agreement on mission alignment and certain governance behaviors, but some items drew disagreement: several trustees said the board’s goals are not specific or measurable, and two trustees indicated the board did not engage frequently enough in meaningful discussions about student performance. A small number of trustees also said public-comment procedures felt unclear or unfair.
Members agreed to work toward SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, time-bound) goals and to follow up with the superintendent and staff on how the state Department of Education will review the board’s statement. Trustees asked for clearer, nontechnical presentations of assessment results: staff said state accountability scores are expected in August and described teacher-level professional learning communities that review student-by-student growth. Staff also outlined plans for a standards-based report card in early grades to present mastery-level results rather than letter grades.
Trustees asked administration to obtain a digestible example of assessment reporting that could be used in a board training session, and to consider addressing board members’ concerns about public-comment procedures when setting next year’s goals.
What happens next: Staff will prepare clearer assessment summaries for trustees and work with the board to develop measurable goals ahead of the next reporting cycle; the state Department of Education has the board’s appraisal for follow-up.
