Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wolf Creek Reservoir topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rangely council approves $200,000 for Wolf Creek Reservoir planning after lengthy presentation and debate
Summary
After a detailed presentation on the Wolf Creek/Taylor Draw project, the Rangely Town Council approved release of $200,000 to the Real Blanco Water Conservancy District to support permitting and studies; council members pressed for evidence of local benefit and requested follow‑up reporting.
Get email alerts on the Wolf Creek Reservoir topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Rangely Town Council voted to release $200,000 to the Real Blanco Water Conservancy District to support planning and permitting for the Wolf Creek/Taylor Draw Reservoir project after a presentation from the district manager and extended council questions.
Alden (identified in the meeting transcript as a district manager for the Real Blanco Water Conservancy District) reviewed the project’s scope, describing it as a run‑of‑the‑river design with constrained storage, ongoing sedimentation at some existing reservoirs, and retained flood‑control and hydropower elements at Taylor Draw. He said federal and state permitting remains substantial — naming coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, BLM, EPA and USDA — and reported that biological, soils and cultural studies for some project components are in draft form.
Alden told councilors that the district is updating economic and hydrologic models and that the project team hopes to produce a firm yield and storage to benefit local water users. He discussed a phased program of technical work (geophysical surveys and borings) and said that intrusive field work would not begin until the Army Corps issues a notice of intent and other cooperating agencies agree on the plan of development.
Council members raised questions about how the town’s $200,000 would yield local benefits. One council member pressed for the full economic analysis that underlies projected direct‑spending and job figures; Alden offered to share the complete report and agreed to provide periodic updates about how Rangely’s funds are spent. Councilors also asked about the project timeline and the significant permitting uncertainty; Alden said there is no firm schedule for a notice of intent and that some phases depend on federal review cycles.
After questions and public discussion, councilmember Kyle moved to approve the release of the funds; the motion was seconded by Tim and carried. After the vote, Alden said the money would be used as part of a broader funding package (including contributions from county, River District and congressional directed funds) to advance studies and permitting toward a record of decision.
Councilors who supported the contribution expressed appreciation for the presenter’s long‑term work on the project but emphasized the need for transparency and for the district to demonstrate tangible near‑term benefits to Rangely. One councilor recorded an abstention and cited a potential conflict; no fines or conditions were attached to the funding approval at the meeting.
The council asked the district to report back on progress, and Alden offered quarterly briefings on expenditures and permitting milestones.

