Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Transparency topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Public commenters press trustees on zoning, data-center moratorium and transparency

Cascade Charter Township Board of Trustees · June 24, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

During public comment at the June 24 meeting, residents praised park safety projects but also alleged a lack of transparency over zoning and possible data-center rezoning tied to a trustee's property; the board declined to respond directly and reiterated that the zoning and referendum processes are subject to public review.

Public commenters at the June 24 Cascade Charter Township meeting voiced support for Tassel Park improvements and a pedestrian underpass, and raised separate concerns about zoning, data centers and trustee transparency.

Kenneth Kerry, who said he lives across from the park, urged the board to fund Tassel Park improvements and the Cascade Road pedestrian underpass, telling trustees the underpass would "save children's lives" and improve village safety and investment prospects.

In a separate comment, Scott Vans disputed a circulating narrative that the board had ignored data centers and recounted that the board had already adopted a temporary moratorium and created a subcommittee to craft a data-center ordinance. He also alleged that "Trustee Rissy signed paperwork ... applying to reszone his two parcels on Cascade Road to Light Industrial," and asked whether trustees with private interests should participate in future data-center decisions.

Craig Merlin told the board that publishing a $17 million notice could be used to avoid future citizen referendums on specific projects, arguing that the ceiling might reduce required public votes on individual project borrowings. He said the public wants assurance that the referendum process and future project approvals will preserve meaningful citizen participation.

Manager Jade declined to respond to the specific accusations during the meeting. Several trustees and staff later defended the board's process for updating the township's 1989 zoning code and said that any spending decisions will return to the DDA and the board for public consideration; Treasurer Corstange noted the board's strategic-plan priorities as the basis for village investments and disputed claims that citizens would be excluded from project decisions.

The meeting record shows commissioners and staff encouraged continued public engagement; staff also pledged to return with more detailed DDA fund-balance and project-scoping information before any bond sale or project award.