Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Andrews Forest Management Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission endorses ACFC reappointment and begins formal review of Andrews Community Forest management plan
Summary
The commission endorsed Brad Elliot for the ACFC recommendation seat and discussed an 8–12 week public review process for the Andrews Community Forest management plan, outlining options to collect edits, reconcile feedback among committees and present to the select board.
The Richmond Conservation Commission endorsed Brad Elliot’s reappointment to the Andrews Community Forest Committee (ACFC) recommendation seat and discussed next steps for public review of the ACFC’s preliminary management plan draft.
Brad Elliot told the commission he has served on ACFC for roughly two and a half years and has helped shepherd the management‑plan drafts. Commissioners praised his leadership and moved to recommend the select board appoint him to the recommendation seat.
ACFC members updated the commission on the management‑plan timeline and review process. The committee reported that its preliminary draft is complete and now in a feedback stage. Commissioners and ACFC discussed two primary approaches to review: (1) individuals submit suggested edits in a word/suggesting mode that are then consolidated by a document manager, or (2) a warned public meeting in which the draft is screen‑shared and edited live for transparency and compliance with open‑meeting law. ACFC proposed an 8–12 week review window to collect comments from RCC, the trails committee and the select board, culminating in at least one public feedback meeting.
Commissioners noted open‑meeting‑law limits on collaborative, unscheduled document editing and discussed practical options for consolidation and scheduling. The ACFC recommended that reviewers use the Word/Google Docs 'suggesting' mode and send edits by a stated deadline so that a single consolidated draft can be posted in the next meeting packet and then discussed publicly.
Next steps: ACFC plans to collect comments, consolidate edits into a single marked‑up draft, and return to the commission with a clear schedule for public review and a proposed select‑board engagement date. The commission will relay consolidated feedback to the select board when ready.
