Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Accessibility Variance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning commission tables variance for accessibility ramp at 537 Junction Lane

Mendota Heights Planning Commission · March 31, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Planning Commission tabled a variance request for an accessibility ramp at 537 Junction Lane after neighbors questioned measurements and materials. Staff and the applicant were directed to verify ramp dimensions and provide more information on proposed materials.

The Mendota Heights Planning Commission on March 31 tabled a variance request from Clarence Tweh to install an accessibility ramp that would encroach more than the five feet allowed into the front yard at 537 Junction Lane.

Community Development Manager Sarah Madden presented the staff report and recommended approval with conditions. Commissioners pressed staff and the applicant for verification of the contractor’s measurements and for clarity about whether a building permit—and an inspection—would be required. Madden said staff had been onsite with the contractor and that permit pathways were still being determined; she noted that an administrative permit would not require an inspection.

Neighbor Jacob Burke opposed the application at the public hearing, saying the ramp "alters the character of the neighborhood," questioning the contractor’s dimensions and noting that the application was "silent on the materials" to be used. Burke also told commissioners the property is used as a group home and said that, in his view, businesses operating in a residential area should preserve neighborhood character.

Commissioners discussed options including requiring an inspection, verifying plan dimensions and asking the applicant about materials that would better match nearby homes. Commissioner Steve Goldade moved—and Commissioner Jeff Nath seconded—to table the case and direct staff and the applicant to verify the dimensions and provide additional information on materials. The motion passed 4-1, with Commissioner Patrick Corbett dissenting.

The Commission did not make a final decision on the variance. Staff told the Commission they could add a condition requiring an inspection if the Building Code did not automatically compel one. The Commission’s direction was to return the item to a future meeting after staff and the applicant provide verified measurements and more information about proposed ramp materials.