Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tourist Rooming topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County board adopts tourist rooming‑house ordinance after months of ad hoc work and heated public debate
Summary
The board approved a health‑and‑human‑services licensing ordinance for short‑term rentals (tourist rooming houses) after receiving extensive public comment from residents and TR owners; supporters said it provides enforcement tools, while critics argued it should be handled through zoning and warned of enforcement costs.
After more than a year of ad hoc committee work, the Sawyer County Board voted to adopt a tourist rooming‑house (TR) ordinance framed as a Health and Human Services licensing tool. Jenny Chab, chair of the ad hoc committee, said the draft is the product of “over a year of deliberations” and an 8–2 committee vote to forward the draft; she urged the county board to use the ordinance to give HHS staff clear standards and enforcement authority.
Supporters at the public microphone described repeated neighborhood disturbances attributed to short‑term rentals — noise complaints, unattended campfires and trespass. Mary Stub described the experience of living next to a short‑term rental and urged passage to protect residential neighborhoods: “it’s time to take action,” she said.
Opponents and some supervisors argued the matter belongs in zoning as a conditional‑use permit, not as an HHS licensing function. Several speakers and board members raised enforcement and resource questions: the HHS budget included a $35,000 uplift noted in the public notice, and multiple commenters said that sum would be insufficient to hire the dedicated staff needed to inspect and enforce the new rules. County staff responded that, if the ordinance is adopted, the department will return with a proposed fee structure and any necessary staffing requests and will aim to make implementation budget‑neutral by covering costs with license fees.
Why it matters: Sawyer County has roughly 600 short‑term rental properties on record, creating a large administrative and enforcement workload if the county moves to active licensing and inspections. The ordinance’s proponents said it offers quicker, more direct enforcement for behavioral and public‑health issues than lengthy zoning conditional‑use processes; opponents said conditional use would better protect property rights and avoid duplicative staff action.
What’s next: staff will draft a license/fee schedule and, if the board approves associated staffing and fees, return with a budget amendment and implementation plan. The board’s action establishes a local standard and a path to enforce occupancy and septic/health rules locally in addition to state agent responsibilities.
