Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Red Bank preservation panel presses for design samples, changes on proposed garage at 65 Washington Street
Summary
The Red Bank Historic Preservation Commission raised design objections to a proposed prefabricated garage at 65 Washington Street — questioning roof orientation, siding, and a roll-down door visible from the street — and asked staff to request material samples and design alternatives after applicants failed to appear at the meeting.
The Red Bank Historic Preservation Commission on June 17 questioned design elements of a proposed prefabricated garage and shed for 65 Washington Street, saying the current plans appear inconsistent with the character of the Victorian-era house and that applicants have not provided sufficient material samples.
Commissioners said the submitted drawings show a shallow, shed-style roof whose orientation and pitch do not match the house’s existing rooflines, and they recommended a roof pitch and decorative details that would read as a historic carriage house from the street. Commissioners also flagged the siding listed in the submission as "Smart tech" (described during the meeting as a vertical, plywood-based panel) and said the commission had not been given a physical sample of the siding, the roof shingle sample, or a clear image or sample of the garage door.
The application calls for a single 9-by-7-foot solid garage door; the commission noted that a plain roll-down metal door would look more utilitarian than traditional carriage doors and suggested applicants consider carriage-style hardware or doors with windows to make the structure visually compatible with the house. Commissioners discussed the option of a carriage-house appearance, matching roof pitch to primary architectural elements, and adding ornamentation or fretwork appropriate to a Victorian property.
Commissioners also discussed jurisdictional limits: zoning and construction-code approvals (setbacks and building-safety review for structures larger than 100 square feet) fall to other municipal departments. Several members said it would be helpful to give applicants informal guidance and to request more detailed materials prior to a zoning or construction submission to reduce the likelihood of a denial at a later stage.
Applicants did not attend the meeting; the commission directed staff to ask them to provide material samples (siding, shingles and a clearer door rendering), to consider a virtual appearance if they cannot attend in person, and to return with revised materials or renderings that address the roof pitch and street-facing appearance. No formal HPC action (such as approval or denial) was taken at the June 17 meeting.
