Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wildlife Buffers topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Conservation board urges large wildlife buffers in Des Moines County wind siting rules
Summary
The Des Moines County Conservation Board recommended 3–5 mile buffers around key habitats and documented bat roosts, asking supervisors to fold those science‑based setbacks into Article 3 of the county's wind‑energy ordinance.
Get email alerts on the Wildlife Buffers topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Members of the Des Moines County Conservation Board presented a memo urging larger, science‑based buffers for wind‑energy projects designed to protect federal and state listed species and sensitive habitats.
A conservation representative (S8) told the board its recommendations draw on US Fish & Wildlife Service guidance, Iowa Department of Natural Resources recommendations and peer‑reviewed studies of raptors and bats. The conservation board recommended, among other items, a 5‑mile buffer from the Mississippi River corridor for active bald eagle nests (citing USFWS landscape guidance), a 3‑mile buffer for properties with documented endangered bat species and a quarter‑mile buffer for forested riparian corridors based on Iowa DNR guidance. "Our recommendation is 5 miles," S8 said when discussing active bald eagle nests in the Mississippi River corridor.
Conservation‑board members acknowledged the memo was distributed to supervisors the morning of the meeting; several board members apologized for the late submission and asked the supervisors to consider the recommendations in finalizing the wildlife and setback sections. "As a board member, I accept responsibility for the late submission of these facts," said Terry Davis (S15), a conservation‑board member.
Board members acknowledged the science but expressed frustration that the memo arrived late. Staff and supervisors agreed to circulate the conservation‑board maps and applicable USFWS/DNR guidance to all supervisors before the next revision of the ordinance language.
What happens next: staff will circulate the conservation maps and guidance; the board will revisit setback distances and wildlife protections when supervisors have had time to review the conservation‑board recommendations.
