Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Landfill Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lincoln County weighs $200 annual refuge assessment, 2.5% escalator as hauling options shrink
Summary
County staff presented three options for handling remote landfill sites — contractor hauling, county-run hauling, or site consolidation — and commissioners directed staff to draft a resolution proposing a $200 annual refuge assessment with a 2.5% yearly increase and to hold public hearings.
Get email alerts on the Landfill Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lincoln County commissioners directed staff to prepare a resolution proposing to raise the county refuge assessment from $150 to $200 a year and to adopt a 2.5% annual escalator after a staff presentation laying out three options for handling remote landfill sites.
The change was presented as part of a broader review of landfill operating costs and options for remote public sites. "The current is $150," a county staff member said while walking through the budget worksheets and projected revenue scenarios. Staff described three basic approaches: (1) consolidate to three public sites (including Happies) and add staff and rolloffs; (2) continue the current hauling contract with a private hauler (Evergreen provided a high-end estimate of about $460,000 for limited-day service at 10 public sites); or (3) terminate the hauling contract and run county hauling with added drivers, vehicles and higher maintenance risk.
Why it matters: staff told commissioners that, with the hauling contract set to expire in November, current revenue and the existing $150 assessment would not cover the county's present service level if the contract lapses. Staff said several of the most remote runs are especially expensive to operate and that green-box sites are costly to maintain without a compactor truck, which the county does not own.
Commissioners discussed hybrid models — contracting for some outlying sites while the county takes over others — and the trade-offs of fewer public sites versus higher revenue. One commissioner summarized the board's direction: "The intent is to move forward with the $200 increase, 2.5% annual." The same commissioner suggested a five-year revisit for the jump in the assessment.
Public input: Ryan Barman, speaking during the meeting's public-comment portion, questioned whether the county should resume hauling operations. "Why does the county want to get back into the trucking business?" he asked, adding that county-run hauling could bring increased liability and cost. Barman also warned the fee increase could be hard for residents to swallow if large local employers are not offering comparable raises.
Next steps: commissioners asked staff to draft a resolution reflecting the board's intent and to schedule informational meetings and formal public hearings (including options for in-person meetings in Eureka and online), then return with the resolution for a public hearing and formal vote.

