Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lincoln County awards HVAC contract to Comfort Systems after bid review
Summary
After reviewing three bids and finding issues with the lowest submission, county staff recommended and the board approved Comfort Systems’ midrange HVAC bid; the county noted a $16,354 recommended price and that the lowest packet entry did not reconcile with its line items.
Get email alerts on the Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lincoln County commissioners approved awarding the county’s HVAC maintenance contract to Comfort Systems after staff recommended the company following a review of three bids.
Joe, the county staff member who reviewed the submissions, told commissioners he eliminated the highest bid on financial grounds and narrowed the choice to two remaining firms. He said Comfort Systems rose to the top because of the time they spent inspecting units, their professionalism and their detailed unit-by-unit assessments. "We went around and looked at every unit, got a ladder out, went up in there, looked at them, discussed the history of each unit, created a database," Joe said.
Staff stated the top bid was $32,860 and said the midrange bid — Comfort Systems’ proposal — was $16,354. The packet’s lowest-bid entry appeared as "10,10" and staff said that submission’s line-item totals did not reconcile with the stated total, that the bidder later described its proposal as rushed, and that the county had followed up to clarify the discrepancy. "The cheapest bid isn't always the best situation," a commissioner said during discussion.
Commissioner 1 moved to accept Joe’s recommendation; another commissioner seconded the motion and it passed by voice vote. The board instructed staff to notify all bidders of the award and to pursue a maintenance program approach aimed at reducing reactive repairs.
Public commenter Tony Wickham of Libby questioned why the county did not choose the apparent low bidder if it was qualified: "If the low bid is qualified, they are qualified to do the work, why not take the low bid, especially in a budget," he said. County staff responded that the low packet lacked adequate explanation and appeared inconsistent, so they treated it as not clearly qualified.
The board’s action was a contract award by voice vote; specific vote tallies were not provided at the meeting. The county said it expects to invest cost savings back into ongoing system maintenance.
What happens next: staff will notify bidders and proceed with contract administration for Comfort Systems.

