Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Solid Waste Leachate topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Oneida County committee approves leachate prefiltration system to cut hauling costs

Oneida County Public Works & Solid Waste Committee · June 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Oneida County Public Works & Solid Waste Committee on April 16 approved installation of a leachate pre‑filtration system to reduce disposal costs, with a 3‑2 recorded opposition from Billy Fried and Robb Jensen; officials said the system could pay for itself within two years.

On April 16, 2026, the Oneida County Public Works & Solid Waste Committee approved installation of a leachate pre‑filtration system to lower the cost of treating landfill leachate. Solid Waste Director Lisa Bauknecht reported the system would allow Oneida County to send pretreated leachate to Rhinelander for $250 per load rather than paying Merrill ($550) or Medford ($900), and she estimated the project would pay for itself within about two years.

Bauknecht presented cost estimates of roughly $22,000 for materials, $55,000 for labor and about $18,000 annually for reading and monitoring. She said the county released $40,000 from a long‑term care account and would fund the remainder from the department’s operating budget; she also noted installation and annual costs could be lowered if department staff performed the work.

Committee member Bob Almekinder said the work needed to be done soon; Robb Jensen and Billy Fried said they wanted clearer demonstration of projected savings and, in Fried’s case, sought to inspect the site and flagged a pending County Board resolution to separate Solid Waste from Highway oversight. On a motion by Almekinder, seconded by Chair Ted Cushing, the committee approved the pre‑filtration system. The record notes opposition from Billy Fried and Robb Jensen; the meeting record implies five committee members were present, producing a 3‑2 outcome.

The committee did not record a detailed implementation schedule in the meeting minutes. Bauknecht said staff would evaluate whether in‑house installation could reduce costs and then proceed with procurement and implementation steps.