Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Conservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rye planning committee moves to simplify cottage court rules and reconsider conservation-acre threshold
Summary
At its April 23 meeting, Rye’s Long Range Planning Committee discussed edits to the cottage court and conservation land development sections of the zoning ordinance, including removing the yield plan requirement and exploring lowering the CLD minimum from 20 to 10 acres; staff will prepare a public presentation and place a Growth Ordinance review on the Rules & Regulations agenda.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Conservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Long Range Planning Committee met April 23 to review proposed edits to Rye’s zoning ordinance intended to simplify the cottage court and conservation land development (CLD) provisions.
Maddie DiIonno, RPC circuit rider, said she revised the cottage court language and amended CLD section 190-4.3, removing the yield plan requirement and the special-use-permit step so the review process would be less burdensome for applicants. DiIonno told the committee that requiring a yield plan can effectively force a near–site-plan level of work and that streamlining would better show what should be conserved versus developed.
Member Patricia Losik flagged technical language that still needs clarification, asking for a firm definition of “net building area” and for Attorney Maher to review 190-4.2.C(5) and provisions relating to upland soils and surface-water buffers. DiIonno said she could add internal references so the ordinance is more user-friendly.
The committee discussed the practical effects of the CLD acreage threshold. Under the current wording, a CLD application must start on 20 acres with 10 acres conserved; DiIonno and members debated whether lowering the minimum to 10 acres would allow more parcels in Rye to use the CLD option. Chair Steve Carter pressed for clearer explanations of minimum lot-size impacts and how any change would fit into existing neighborhoods.
Members agreed the Growth Ordinance also needs review: the committee noted that Rye is not currently following required steps to make the Growth Ordinance legally compliant. Kimberly Reed, the town’s planning and zoning administrator, said she would place the Growth Ordinance review on the Rules & Regulations agenda.
To prepare for public discussion, the committee asked staff to assemble a short presentation for May 19 showing current language, proposed edits, and photographic examples of cottage-court–style development so residents can visualize potential outcomes. Committee members were assigned to collect example photos and forward them to Reed. The next committee meeting was set for May 13 at 10 a.m.
A motion to adjourn was recorded and the meeting closed; minutes list the motion but do not record a mover or a second.
