Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Oronoco schedules zoning-code workshops and reviews RFP scope amid budget overruns
Summary
The commission set RFP workshops for Feb. 19 and Feb. 26 (also March sessions) to review a multi-year zoning-code rewrite now in council’s hands; staff said the RFP work has exceeded the original budget by about $60,000 and that the shoreland section required extensive state and legal review.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The City of Oronoco Planning & Zoning Commission set a series of workshops to guide council review of a comprehensive zoning-code rewrite and related request-for-proposal (RFP) work.
Commissioners scheduled two workshop sessions on Feb. 19 (6:30 p.m.) and Feb. 26 (5:30 p.m.), both available in person at City Hall and via Zoom, and additional RFP workshops on March 19 and March 30. The workshops are intended to let council members ask questions, propose modifications and review evaluation metrics the commission plans to use when scoring RFP responses.
Staff and commissioners said the zoning rewrite effort has been underway for several years and includes planned prefilled permit packets, training materials for applicants and updated language intended to make routine applications easier to navigate.
Staff noted that the RFP effort has required additional meetings, community events and rewrites that have pushed the contract workload beyond original expectations; the group described the overrun as roughly $60,000 above prior projections. The commission also highlighted that the shoreland section of the code required substantial coordination with the state Department of Natural Resources and legal review, and that state law limits local flexibility on that portion of the code.
Commissioners said the workshops will include one session focused on desired scope and another focused on quantitative scoring criteria so that proposals are judged on responsiveness and service levels in addition to price. The intent is for council to have time to review and return any requested changes; commissioners expressed a goal of having the council act on the code by the March council meeting if possible.
The commission emphasized that any changes that council requests will be addressed through the scheduled workshops and follow-up meetings; work on shoreland rules will continue to be constrained by state requirements and legal review.

