Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Code Amendments topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission schedules July work sessions on code amendments and code audit; staff flags state compliance deadlines

Lake Oswego Planning Commission · June 22, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff told the Planning Commission that July 13 will include work sessions on semiannual code amendments and a code-audit update; staff warned some code changes are needed to comply with new state legislation and cited January 1, 2027 compliance targets. A Foothills work session was rescheduled to August 10.

At the June 22 meeting, Lake Oswego staff told the Planning Commission that July 13 will include two work sessions: one on the semiannual (maintenance) code amendments and another providing an update on the city’s code-audit project. Manager Olsen said the semiannual amendments include housekeeping items and some changes needed to comply with new state legislation; staff said some statutory deadlines fall on January 1, 2027.

Senior Planner Evan Franstead was identified as the staff lead on the code-audit project; staff said a consultant is on board and public-involvement planning has begun. Manager Olsen asked for a volunteer from the commission to participate in parts of the code-audit outreach and noted the city hopes to arrange a site tour related to projects tied to the code audit and rezoning work.

Staff also said the July 27 meeting was pushed to August 10 for the Foothills work session. Commissioners confirmed there was no item currently scheduled for July 27. Staff asked commissioners to watch for further materials and said additional outreach details would be provided in advance of the July work sessions.

During the schedule discussion staff mentioned specific state bills by number but also noted uncertainty about the exact bill citations; the takeaway for the commission was that state law changes require timely local code amendments.