Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Entitled Vacant Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident urges action on vacant entitled housing sites; staff outlines entitlement timelines
Summary
During public communications, resident Glenn Overly asked commissioners to press council and staff to move stalled entitled housing projects in Midtown; staff said entitlements commonly last 1–3 years and may be extended administratively, with larger projects sometimes governed by multi‑year development agreements.
Get email alerts on the Entitled Vacant Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Glenn Overly opened the meeting’s public-comment period by telling the Planning Commission he was “frustrated” that several entitled housing projects in Midtown — including sites on Thompson and Seaward near Baskin Robbins — remain vacant after receiving approvals.
"You guys work very hard to get these properties through here and entitled and then they set vacant without being developed," Overly said, urging commissioners to push council members and community development staff to follow up and encourage construction.
Assistant Community Development Director Maru Hawkland responded that entitlements have variable durations: coastal development permits commonly have 12-month thresholds, many permits have two-year terms and use permits can run up to three years. She said administrative time extensions are available and that some very large projects governed by development agreements can be extended under state law for much longer periods. Planning manager Miss Farley noted that permits expire automatically if no extension is filed, and that staff can administratively issue extensions with justification in many cases.
Staff offered to research the specific Midtown sites Overly mentioned and provide status updates. Commissioners and staff agreed that financing, market conditions, and construction constraints — not the commission’s approval process — commonly account for delays between entitlement and shovel‑ready construction.
The exchange highlighted resident frustration about the pace of housing delivery after approval and clarified city procedures for entitlement durations and extensions.

