Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Heritage Trees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission explores incentives and a voluntary heritage-tree program to encourage private-tree preservation
Summary
At council direction, the Sandpoint Urban Forestry Commission reviewed legal limits and several incentive options to encourage developers and property owners to retain significant private trees, and discussed a companion voluntary heritage-tree program to recognize trees without creating property restrictions.
The Sandpoint Urban Forestry Commission spent a large portion of its June 26 meeting exploring options to incentivize preservation of significant trees on private property and reviewing a draft voluntary heritage-tree program.
Staff briefed members on the council request to coordinate with planning and zoning on developer incentives such as reduced setbacks as an optional tradeoff for preserving qualifying trees. "In Idaho, private property laws are... pretty black and white," staff liaison Eric Bush said, explaining the city cannot bar tree removal on private land but can offer legally defensible incentives.
Commissioners discussed several approaches: a setback reduction that developers could accept in exchange for preserving trees; impact-fee deductions; in-lieu replacement fees tied to total removed DBH (diameter at breast height); and limited replacement ratios rather than impossible inch-for-inch replacement. Commissioners repeatedly cautioned against creating a long menu of options that could produce loopholes; instead, multiple members favored a narrower set of one or two clear incentives that would be administratively feasible and attractive to developers.
The commission also reviewed a draft voluntary heritage-tree program intended to be nonregulatory and educational. The program would allow the commission to designate public trees and, on a voluntary basis, private trees when the property owner agrees. The draft contemplates listing designated trees on the city website, providing consistent criteria (historical specimen, rare, significant growth or ecological value) and allowing owners to remove voluntary designations if they later decline them.
Members asked staff to invite City Planner Bill Dean to a future meeting for legal and code-implementation guidance and suggested legal research on what incentives are allowable under Idaho law. No incentives or policy changes were adopted at the June 26 meeting; commissioners asked staff to refine options for future discussion.
