Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Oceanville Bridge topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
MDOT engineers brief Stonington on Oceanville bridge replacement; town faces potential cost share for granite facing
Summary
MDOT engineers told selectmen that the Oceanville bridge northern piling sits on glacial till rather than bedrock, limiting repair options; MDOT estimated about $200,000 for granite facing restoration and offered a 50% municipal agreement, which would leave the town responsible for roughly $100,000 if it chooses that aesthetic treatment.
Get email alerts on the Oceanville Bridge topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
State Department of Transportation engineers told Stonington selectmen that replacing the Oceanville bridge will be more complex than a simple metal span swap because northern piles sit on glacial till rather than bedrock.
Andrew Lathe and engineering partner Jaime French explained that the northern piling is compromised and that a full replacement would require structural work beyond simply changing the metal span. Lathe said aesthetics were a frequent concern in public comments: "Estimates are around $200,000 to re do [the granite facing], although it won't exactly be the same," he said, and he offered details on a municipal agreement that can split the cost 50/50 with MDOT.
Residents asked whether the project could preserve the granite facing or use concrete to reinforce pilings. Engineers noted technical limits: because the piling is not on bedrock, some stabilization approaches are problematic. The board discussed options including a municipal agreement for granite facing, a one‑lane replacement with traffic signals as an alternative, and further engineering review.
The Selectmen thanked MDOT for coming and asked for more detailed cost estimates and further community outreach; MDOT said it would meet with abutters separately before returning to the board.
Next steps: MDOT will follow up with abutter meetings and provide refined estimates; the board will solicit public feedback and consider whether to pursue a municipal agreement that could obligate the town for a share of the aesthetic work.
