Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Subdivision Release topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Board certifies release of SNT Trail Estates lots after developer posts security; abutter raises runoff and screening concerns
Summary
The board certified release of lots at the SNT Trail Estates subdivision after staff confirmed a $413,000 security was posted; abutter David Kelly raised concerns about construction-phase sedimentation and asked the developer to provide additional visual screening.
Get email alerts on the Subdivision Release topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Bellingham Planning Board voted on June 26 to certify release of lots at the SNT Trail Estates subdivision after the developer posted security intended to guarantee completion of required infrastructure. The board’s action authorizes conveyance of lots subject to completing Form G and necessary notarizations.
Planning staff told the board a Form F covenant requiring completion of subdivision infrastructure had been attached to the project and that the owner posted security and a performance bond of $413,000 in January to secure the remaining work. The developer is now seeking release of the covenant so lots can be conveyed.
Neighbor David Kelly, who identified himself as the owner of the abutting property at 340 Lake Street, told the board he had raised concerns about construction-phase sedimentation and erosion and had a consultant (‘‘Bill from Land Plan’’) inspect the site. Kelly said the consultant believes runoff risks are manageable but asked the developer to provide additional visual screening, suggesting moving street trees or planting arborvitae between his house and the new road to improve privacy and safety for his young daughter.
Planning staff and board members confirmed the infrastructure was built ‘‘as approved’’ and that peer-reviewed plans were in place. Board members noted that matters like private fences or screening on private lots are generally between property owners and developers, not a planning-board enforcement action, but encouraged the developer and the neighbor to continue working together.
After discussion the board moved to certify release of the lots, subject to Form G being signed and notarized; the chair asked a member to come to town offices the next day to notarize signatures. The motion passed by roll-call affirmation.
The board’s action allows lot conveyance to proceed while the posted security remains a means of assuring completion if additional infrastructure work is required. Neighbors were reminded they may send comments by email for the record and that the planning office posts agendas and permits on the town website.

