Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Recodification topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Sac City Council approves first reading of comprehensive zoning recodification ordinance

Sac City Council · June 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Sac City Council voted unanimously to approve the first reading of Ordinance No. 2026-341, a comprehensive recodification of the city zoning code intended to digitize regulations and update provisions last revised in 2006. A public hearing drew no written comments and Planning and Zoning recommended approval.

The Sac City Council unanimously approved the first reading of Ordinance No. 2026-341, titled 'Ordinance Adopting the 2026 Sac City Zoning Ordinance,' during its Feb. 24 meeting. Mayor Scott Bundt presided; the motion for first reading was made by Councilmember Kayla Shull and seconded by Councilmember Tom Lownik.

Council held a public hearing on the proposed recodification during the meeting; the transcript records that no written comments were received. Members said the Planning and Zoning board recommended approval. According to the presentation to the council, the last comprehensive recodification occurred in 2006 and the new ordinance will digitize the code and bring several provisions into alignment with modern legal standards.

The first-reading approval advances the ordinance through the legislative process; the transcript does not specify a date for second reading or final adoption. Council did not record substantive public opposition or amendments during the hearing. The council’s vote on first reading was unanimous: Bruening, Lownik, Mahler, Murley and Shull voted yes.

If adopted after subsequent readings and any required notices, the ordinance would replace the existing zoning code with the recodified text presented to the council. The transcript does not list specific text changes, implementation dates, or transitional rules, and those details were not specified in the meeting record.