Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bloomfield council approves drafting development agreements for expanding Metal Wholesale, will consider tax-abatement terms later
Summary
Council voted to have city attorneys prepare draft development agreements for Metal Wholesale and another expanding firm and to review specific tax‑abatement amounts later; staff described how abatements are calculated and recommended employment commitments tied to reimbursements.
The Bloomfield City Council voted to direct city staff and the city attorney to prepare draft development agreements for Metal Wholesale and a second expanding company, with specific tax‑abatement amounts to be decided at a later date.
Community Development staff told the council they toured the companies’ facilities and said, “they were really gracious to take me around, show me how everything worked…and they are looking to hire an additional 15 employees,” and asked the council to authorize beginning a draft agreement and run the numbers with the city’s attorney. The staff presentation explained how the local tax‑increment/TIF rebate formula typically reimburses a portion of additional property taxes and cited prior abatements as context.
Why it matters: The requested abatement was described by staff as “up to $500,000 for 15 years” as a ceiling the company proposed; staff cautioned the council that the actual reimbursement is a formulaic portion of assessed-value increases and often amounts to roughly one‑third to one‑half of a year’s property tax depending on the calculation. Staff also recommended including binding employment commitments in the agreement so reimbursements are linked to verified job creation.
Council action and next steps: The council voted to authorize staff to proceed with draft development agreements for both companies and to return later with specific dollar limits and a proposed employment worksheet. No final abatement amounts or formal agreements were approved at the meeting; councilors specifically instructed staff to involve the city attorney (Allers & Cooney) in preparing the drafts.
Budget context and constraints: Staff reported $75,000 unallocated in the TIF fund and $102,000 in a TIF rebate fund already earmarked for prior abatements, indicating limited available incremental TIF dollars. Staff noted that abatements are paid as reimbursements (not upfront grants) and that the city can structure term limits (for example, 15 years) so that the abatement stops when the cap is reached.
