Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Consultant previews Guilford draft Plan of Conservation and Development; 65‑day review opens
Summary
On June 1 the board heard a detailed presentation on Guilford’s draft Plan of Conservation and Development (POCD). Consultant David Murphy summarized outreach, a new five‑theme structure and a future land‑use map; the plan now enters a 65‑day state referral and public comment period.
David Murphy, the consultant leading Guilford’s POCD update, presented the draft plan to the Board of Selectmen on June 1, outlining community outreach, structure changes and next steps. He said the project gathered roughly 260 survey responses and included pop‑up events and workshops to reach residents and boards.
Murphy told the board the update shifts to a theme‑based layout—live, grow, connect, conserve and sustain—with 11 goals, about 24 strategies and roughly 140 actions supporting those goals. He said the draft deliberately separates the plan’s narrative from the future land‑use plan, noting the latter is advisory (not a zoning map) but will guide Planning and Zoning in evaluating applications.
Board members pressed Murphy on attendance at public meetings, what “socially connected community” means in practice, and how the draft balances preservation with targeted growth. Murphy said the plan tightens language to show development is anticipated in appropriate locations (for example, along the Post Road and within areas already zoned for growth), and that it deliberately avoids proposing broad development in the town’s northern rural sections.
Murphy reviewed the statutory review steps: the town has entered the 65‑day referral and comment period, during which the draft has been distributed to state agencies including the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection and regional partners. Planning and Zoning will receive comments and is scheduled to meet July 1 to hold its public hearing and consider adoption or continuation. Murphy encouraged the Selectmen to submit written comments if they wish but noted the Planning and Zoning Commission holds the formal adoption authority.
The board did not take formal action on the plan at the meeting; Murphy closed by offering staff and consultant support for clarifying draft language and addressing public questions ahead of the Planning and Zoning meeting.
