Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the After The Fact Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Autographics owner granted variance after after‑the‑fact entry enclosure drawing sharp board debate
Summary
Ron Benin of Autographics received a variance for an enclosed front entry and shed roof added without prior board approval; the board split over enforcement and precedent but ultimately approved the exception after discussion and a letter opposing the change was read into the record.
Get email alerts on the After The Fact Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ron Benin, owner of Autographics, asked the Sheldon City Board of Adjustment to approve a setback variance for a shed roof and enclosed entry that were built without completing the board review and permitting process.
Benin said state highway and sidewalk work changed water runoff in front of his building and that he proceeded to enclose the entry and add the roof because he "needed to get the roof on there" to protect equipment and the structure from pooling water. Zoning staff said they had asked him to stop work and that enclosure of the entry altered the footprint of the building, which prompted the request for a variance.
Tucker Anderson, owner of Universal Pediatrics, submitted a written letter opposing the variance, arguing the changes would encroach on required setbacks and could harm visibility, parking and neighborhood appearance. The letter urged the board to deny the request to avoid setting a precedent for future encroachments.
Board members debated the weight of the improvement against the fact work began before permits were obtained. One member said improvement of the property was evident but objected to "ask forgiveness later" as a practice; another said the state sidewalk changes made the owner's concern understandable. After discussion the board voted; the item initially produced a tied vote but a subsequent change in a recorded vote produced a majority and the motion to approve carried. The board recorded that applicants who alter property without approvals risk losing support and that future applicants should follow stop‑work directions from staff.

