Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hamilton County 911 dispatchers urge Chattanooga Council to fund pay increases after budget vote
Summary
A group of Hamilton County 911 telecommunicators told the Chattanooga City Council during public comment that pay has lagged peer jurisdictions, stressed their role as the 'first responders' on calls, and asked the city to participate in a multi‑year pay plan; city staff said it could not commit to the plan's multi‑year obligation without identified long‑term funding but agreed to further talks.
At the June 23 Chattanooga City Council meeting multiple Hamilton County 911 telecommunicators delivered testimony urging the city to commit funds to a proposed multi‑year pay plan.
"When someone dials 911, dispatchers are the first first responders," said Jamarcus Williams during public comment, describing prolonged emergency calls he has handled and telling the council that telecommunicators are among the lowest paid in the region. Williams said the first‑year contribution requested from Chattanooga was approximately $139,000 and framed the request as a public‑safety priority rather than a personnel rivalry with sworn officers.
Other telecommunicators backed the request. "Public safety does begin with the person who answers the phone," said Cheyenne Bedell, a dispatcher with 14 years’ experience, and described the specialized training and the retention problems caused by vacancies, overtime and burnout. Several speakers noted Hamilton County 911 answers roughly 580,000–600,000 calls a year and that more than two‑thirds originate in the city.
Vice Chair Elliott and other council members asked clarifying questions about employment status and funding mechanics. Mandy Green, chief operating officer, told the council the 911 district is a joint system funded by participating agencies and explained the city could not accept the board’s proposed multi‑year plan as presented because it would bind future councils and mayoral administrations to multi‑year payments without an identified long‑term revenue source. "We are more than willing to sit down and talk to the Hamilton County 911 board," Green said, "but we just couldn't agree to the one they proposed." The chief of police said the issue required CFO‑level discussions between the 911 executive director and the major funding agencies to determine a sustainable implementation path.
Council members and staff said they appreciate the dispatchers’ work and will continue discussions with the 911 board and county partners. No city commitment to the proposed multi‑year schedule was made at the meeting; council members asked staff to pursue additional data, fiscal comparators and CFO‑level meetings ahead of further action.
Next steps: staff indicated follow‑up conversations with Hamilton County 911 leadership and the agencies’ finance officers, and council members expected additional information in subsequent meetings.
