Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Net Metering topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council committee advances changes to Cleveland net‑metering that would add fixed availability charges for rooftop solar

Cleveland City Council Utilities Committee · June 25, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The utilities committee approved emergency ordinances to update Cleveland's 2009 net‑metering rules, preserving generation credits but adding an availability kilowatt‑hour charge estimated at about $13 (summer) to $16 (winter) to spread system costs and avoid cross‑subsidies.

Council’s utilities committee on June 25 approved two emergency ordinances (Nos. 587 and 588, 2026) to revise Cleveland’s net‑metering framework for behind‑the‑meter renewable generation.

The director of public utilities told the committee the 2009 net‑metering rules are outdated and that the changes will continue to credit customers who generate more than they consume but add a standardized formula to recover the availability cost of the distribution system. The director said the change is intended to prevent non‑solar customers from subsidizing customers who install rooftop or behind‑the‑meter solar, and described an expected monthly availability charge of roughly $13 in the summer and $16 in the winter for an average household under the proposed formula. The director also said power‑supply‑recovery charges would still be reduced by the amount of on‑site generation produced and that any unused credits would roll forward but could forfeit if not used during an account’s life or if the customer leaves the system.

Committee members asked whether customers commonly pair rooftop arrays with batteries; the director said battery backup uptake is minimal (under 1% currently) and that the ordinance targets behind‑the‑meter generation rather than community solar projects that are in front of the meter. Councilwoman Hudson asked whether excess generation is stored; the director explained credits and forfeiture conditions and confirmed credits would continue to roll but may be forfeited at account closure.

Why it matters: The changes attempt to balance promotion of distributed renewable generation with the financial impacts on other ratepayers and the reliability needs of the distribution network. The committee approved the ordinances as presented and asked the Council clerk to record sign‑ups for final proceedings at the committee of the whole.

What’s next: The ordinances will be scheduled for further consideration by the full council; implementation details and the precise billing formula were described by staff as subject to administrative calculation and further review.