Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Berlin forum lays out security steps after social-media threat; parents press for clearer notifications and consistent phone policy
Summary
Berlin Public Schools and town officials described multi-year security upgrades ' armed officers, 350+ cameras, vestibules ' reviewed communication and threat-assessment rules after a Snapchat-linked McGee alert; parents challenged phone-box consistency and asked for clearer parent notifications.
Get email alerts on the School Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Berlin Public Schools and Town of Berlin leaders told an audience of parents and residents on Monday evening that the district has layered security measures in place and is continuing to study technological upgrades after a recent Snapchat-linked alert affecting McGee Middle School.
At a community forum convened by the Board of Education, Superintendent Brian Benigni said the district's approach is collaborative and proactive, tracing security changes over several years. "I decide whether the school is closed as part of my job as your superintendent, just as I do with snow days," Benigni said, describing how he consults police and the district security director when weighing the credibility of a threat and whether to close a building.
Why it matters: The forum aimed to explain what the district already does to protect students and staff and to field parent questions about how the district notifies families, how it assesses threats, and whether classroom phone boxes and training programs should change.
What officials described
- Security staffing and physical protections: School leaders said the district now has seven armed security staff and one school resource officer assigned to the high school, and that first-floor windows and doors are covered with 3M shatter film. "Currently we have seven armed security staff," a district official stated.
- Plans and drills: Director of Security John Scholtz described a state-required all-hazards plan with annexes for active-intruder, suicide, weapons and other scenarios. He emphasized that these plans are living documents and that the district conducts logged drills, unannounced plainclothes access tests, and periodic tabletop reviews.
- Access control and monitoring: Officials said staff badges control entry, high-school students use IDs, and security vestibules (buzz-in entries) limit unscreened access. The district also operates a camera system with more than 350 cameras that can be accessed by security staff and, in emergencies, by police.
- Communications and threat assessment: Police and school officials described a tiered approach to social-media and tip-based threats. Chief Matt (police) said investigators use a credibility matrix that treats non-specific, nationwide social-media posts differently from specific, time-and-place threats, though all reports are taken seriously. Police noted that Snapchats and disappearing messages complicate evidence collection and urged parents to preserve screenshots when possible.
- Technology under consideration: Officials discussed possible investments including distress-location ID tags that pinpoint the location of a triggered alarm inside a building, AI-assisted weapons detection and student-location tools, portable metal detectors for large events, and device-monitoring services that flag high-risk search activity.
Parent concerns raised at the forum
- Notification speed and clarity: Several parents asked why some alarms or incidents generate delayed or brief emails. Officials replied that best practice is to secure students and the scene first; voicemails or district-wide calls are reserved for higher-magnitude incidents when verified information is available. "If it's something of a drastic degree you would get a voicemail from either myself or the principal," a speaker said.
- Phone-box consistency: The high school uses classroom phone boxes (students place phones in boxes during lessons and reclaim them between classes), a hybrid policy intended to reduce classroom distraction while allowing access at non-instructional times. Some parents said implementation is inconsistent between teachers and incidents; the board said the policy is now schoolwide and will be reviewed for consistency.
- Reporting and evidence: Parents asked whether apps are used to submit threats. Officials said they have evaluated apps but found many districts struggle to monitor the volume of incoming reports. Police reiterated that parents should call police or bring evidence to school administrators; preserved screenshots materially help investigations.
Training debate
Parents and an educator urged further consideration of ALICE-style options (Alert, Lockdown, Inform, Counter, Evacuate) for age-appropriate instruction. Security and police officials said components of ALICE may be useful but cautioned that evacuation decisions depend on real-time tactical information, available radio communications and the safety of intended evacuation routes.
What remains under review
Officials said budget cycles and town funding drive the pace of equipment upgrades and that many measures rely on mutual aid and intelligence centers. They described ongoing discussions about AI tools, upgraded monitoring systems, metal-detector options for special events and improving consistent parent notifications.
Closing: Officials encouraged continued reporting of suspicious activity and emphasized coordination between the district and Berlin police. Officer Mark Depinto, the district's school resource officer, told residents: "You're never bothering us ' let us do our job," urging early reporting even when investigations show no actionable threat.
The forum closed with officials asking residents to share concerns with principals, the security director or police, and with a pledge to revisit implementation and communication practices going forward.

