Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Winchester school board rejects superintendent's FY27 appropriation, delays budget decision to March 3

Winchester Public Schools Board of Education · June 29, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After presentations on district performance and staff caseloads, the Winchester Public Schools Board of Education on Feb. 26, 2026 rejected the superintendent's proposed FY27 appropriated budget and multiple amendment proposals, and voted to suspend further discussion until March 3.

The Winchester Public Schools Board of Education voted down the superintendent's proposed FY27 appropriated budget at a special budget workshop on Feb. 26, 2026, and agreed to suspend further discussion until a reconvened meeting on March 3.

Board Chair Kurt Werner called the meeting to order in the Hicks Room. The Superintendent opened with a presentation of Winchester Public Schools' performance index data comparing WPS with 11 similar towns; WPS staff also updated the board on efforts to increase ECS funding for the coming year. Giovanni Cutaia, the district's Board Certified Behavior Analyst, told the board that a typical BCBA caseload is 8–12 students and reported that his current caseload is 30 students, a detail discussed as part of staffing and resource considerations.

Board member Christine Rylander moved to approve the appropriated FY27 budget request at $26,509,482; board member Elinor Bishop seconded the main motion. Several members proposed amendments to lower the appropriation. Joseph Santoro moved (seconded by Frank Oliveri) to amend the figure to $25,990,452; that amendment failed on a 1-8 vote, with Santoro the lone yes. Nora Mocarski then moved an amendment to set the appropriation at $26,131,973 (a $418,589 reduction); that proposal failed 3-6, with Rylander, Mocarski and Bishop voting yes. Frank Oliveri moved an amendment to $25,868,482 (a $682,080 reduction), which failed 2-7 (yes votes: Santoro and Oliveri). Mocarski returned with a $26,098,482 amendment (a $452,080 reduction), which also failed 2-7 (yes votes: Rylander and Mocarski).

After a second recess, the main motion to adopt the superintendent's $26,509,482 appropriation was put to a vote and failed 2-7 (yes votes: Rylander and Bishop). Chair Kurt Werner then moved, and Jonathan Morhardt seconded, a motion to suspend further discussion on the FY27 appropriation and reconvene on Tuesday, March 3; that motion passed unanimously. A single public comment was offered later in the meeting (the speaker was not named in the minutes). The board adjourned after a unanimous motion to end the session.

Why it matters: The votes on Feb. 26 leave the district without a finalized appropriated budget for FY27; the reconvened session on March 3 will decide whether the board can agree on a spending level, affecting staffing, special education caseload management and the district's pursuit of additional ECS funding.

What's next: The board will reconvene on March 3 to continue the FY27 budget discussion and consider any further amendments or an adjusted appropriation.