Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County opens public hearing on rewritten subdivision and lease/rent rules; adoption set for May 27
Summary
A consultant reviewed a grant‑funded rewrite of Lincoln County’s subdivision and buildings‑for‑lease-or‑rent regulations that incorporates recent state law changes, adds water and fire provisions, and aims to streamline design standards; the planning board recommends adoption May 27 and public comments emphasized building‑code safety concerns.
Lincoln County held a public hearing May 13 on comprehensive updates to its subdivision regulations and related rules governing buildings for lease or rent. The draft rewrite, prepared by KMR Consulting and funded by a Montana Community Reinvestment Program grant, incorporates statutory changes, case‑law guidance and recommendations from a multi‑stakeholder steering committee.
Key proposals reviewed by consultant Kristen Smith include:
- Reorganizing the regulations (moving exemption language and parkland dedication references to reduce duplication). - Allowing family transfers within subdivisions under specified conditions and committing to a 20‑working‑day review for certain exemption requests. - Adding a notice‑of‑intent and groundwater‑monitoring triggers; requiring letters from service providers to demonstrate capacity to serve proposed subdivisions. - Strengthening fire‑safety alignment with the community wildfire protection plan and increasing roadside fuel‑reduction width from 5 to 15 feet. - Preserving the current 24‑foot road standard after the planning board rejected a steering‑committee recommendation to narrow roads.
Smith said the rewrite also clarifies phased development reviews, trims redundant language and will make application forms fillable and available online. Resolution 2026‑14 (subdivision regulations) and Resolution 2026‑15 (buildings for lease or rent) were read into the record; the board will accept written and in‑person comment through May 27 before taking final action.
Public comment highlighted building safety concerns for multi‑unit rental housing. “I’d like to see more regulation as far as how these are built in the county,” said Zach McNe, who urged county plan‑review or firewall requirements for attached multi‑unit housing so developers cannot avoid basic fire and safety standards by building units below state thresholds.
Why it matters: The proposed changes aim to modernize regulations, reduce unnecessary barriers to affordable development, and align county standards with state law and fire‑safety practice while clarifying review timelines and service‑provider responsibilities. Changes could affect future subdivisions, mobile‑home and RV parks, and multi‑unit rental development.
Next steps: The board will accept comments through the May 27 hearing and is slated to act on Resolutions 2026‑14 and 2026‑15 at that meeting.
