Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Permits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hobart Redevelopment Authority affirms planning commission’s fill-permit decision for petition 2601
Summary
At its meeting, the Hobart City Redevelopment Authority voted to affirm the planning commission’s grant of a fill permit under petition 2601, citing review of written and on-the-record evidence and citing Hoover Municipal Road Section 15904; formal notice to appellants will be sent in writing.
The Hobart City Redevelopment Authority voted to affirm a planning commission decision granting a fill permit under petition 2601, the Chair said at the meeting.
"Having considered all of the evidence presented both in writing and on the record," the Chair said when moving to affirm the commission’s decision. The authority heard no discussion and carried the motion by voice vote.
Why it matters: The vote ends the authority’s consideration of the appeals listed on the record and keeps in place the planning commission’s approval of the fill permit. The Chair referenced Hoover Municipal Road Section 15904 (the local provision the authority relied on when assessing fill permits) while framing the legal standard for review.
What happened: The Chair read the list of individuals and entities who filed appeals and then moved to affirm the planning commission’s action. The motion was made in open session, and after the Chair indicated there was no further discussion the board voted by voice; the Chair announced the motion carried. The transcript does not record a roll-call vote or individual tallies and does not specify a mover beyond the Chair’s on-the-record motion.
Who is affected: The record lists multiple appellants whose written appeals will be notified in writing of the decision. The transcript names several appellants, including Eric Morris (on behalf of Stonematals LLC), Vance and Susan Thompson, Angelina Soriano, Joseph Khan, Jennifer McQuaid and Erin Bennett; the transcript contains additional names that were read into the record.
Process and next steps: The Chair stated that the authority’s decision will be communicated in writing to each person who filed an appeal. The transcript does not specify a deadline for any further appeals or administrative steps.
The authority moved on to other agenda items after the vote.
