Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Grievances Staff Notices topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Stamford board upholds one grievance, denies two over late staff notices and missing stipend details
Summary
The Stamford School District grievance panel denied grievances 9-18 and 9-21 but upheld grievance 9-20 after finding a contract-language violation tied to June 15 notification timing; the board urged clearer timelines and a working committee to prevent future delays.
Andy George, who presided at the Stamford School District grievance hearing on Aug. 20, announced the board denied grievances 9-18 and 9-21 but upheld grievance 9-20, voting 3-0-0 on each action.
The grievances, brought by the Stamford Classroom Association (SCA) and presented by Guy Simone of the SEA, challenged the district for missing June 15 notification deadlines and for salary agreements that did not include stipend amounts. "It's an intentional snubbing of the agreement," Simone said, arguing that staff had not received full schedules or stipend details in time.
John Corcoran of the SCA told the panel the union coordinated a joint communication to reduce calls and filed the grievance promptly after June 15 fell on a weekend. "We will be grieving this," Corcoran said, describing the union's intent to seek remedies while keeping staff informed.
Dr. Fernandez, speaking for district administration, disputed the charge that the district had intentionally ignored contract terms and described a complex HR process involving finance and position control. He cited an unusually heavy set of operational factors this year — including budget cuts, a large reorganization and significant summer resignations — that prolonged the process. "I really take issue with that," Dr. Fernandez said in response to the union's characterization, while acknowledging the work was difficult and proposing a joint committee to clarify timelines and contract language.
The panel recorded that salary agreements had been sent but that stipend amounts and special-payment details remained outstanding; HR lead Melissa Wills said her office expected a compiled stipend spreadsheet "by Wednesday." Board members pressed administration on compliance status and the timeline for issuing full stipend information.
On the motions, Andy George moved to deny grievances 9-18 and 9-21; Jackie Huffman seconded and the panel approved the motion 3-0-0. For grievance 9-20, George moved to uphold the grievance, Michael Hyman seconded, and the panel voted 3-0-0 to uphold it, noting that the language in the relevant contract article more narrowly required issuance by June 15 in that instance.
The board said it would not at this time adopt the compensation remedies sought by the SCA but encouraged work with the union and staff to clarify contract language and operational timelines during upcoming negotiations. The board also asked administration to produce data on the outstanding stipend amounts and to participate in a working group with union and finance representation to prevent future delays.
The meeting record notes the panel recognized frustration on both sides and urged that the June 15 deadline and related contract provisions be prioritized in negotiations so future compliance is clearer.
