Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves conditional M1 rezoning after residents press for clearer zoning definitions
Summary
After extended discussion and public comment about decades‑old zoning definitions, the Pella City Council approved second reading of Ordinance 1049 to conditionally rezone a 10‑acre parcel to M1 but declined to waive the third reading the same night.
The Pella City Council voted to approve second reading of Ordinance 1049, a conditional amendment to the M1 zoning boundary for a roughly 10‑acre parcel along 218th Place, after an extended public discussion over ambiguous zoning definitions.
Resident Fred Craigus spoke during public comment on behalf of a nearby homeowner and urged the council to provide explicit definitions for terms in section 16511 (examples cited: “maintenance facilities,” “utilities,” “dressed beef processing”) so future buyers and neighbors would clearly know what uses are permitted. “There are no definitions for these words...and under M1 these uses are all permitted,” Craigus said, arguing the code’s vintage language leaves room for uses residents find concerning.
Jerry, the city’s zoning administrator, responded that many definitions date to a 1976 code and are intentionally broad; he emphasized the city uses a use‑matrix and the conditional zoning Exhibit B is the operative list of what is allowed on the specific parcel. “This document ... was done in 1976 so some of the words in here don't have the meaning they had back then,” Jerry said, adding that the conditional rezoning narrows allowable uses by striking items from the full M1 list and that additional approval steps (site plan review, Planning and Zoning Commission) would still apply.
City staff (Mike) reiterated that the comprehensive plan and the use matrix guide rezonings and that the city is concurrently updating its comprehensive plan and zoning code to address such ambiguities. Mike noted the comprehensive plan update contract was recommended for approval that night and that code updates are intended to correct issues like the ones raised.
Councilmembers debated whether the conditional Exhibit B sufficiently limits uses; after discussion the council voted to approve the ordinance reading recorded in the minutes. A subsequent motion to set aside the council rules to adopt the ordinance on third and final reading the same night failed, so the council did not waive the waiting period for final adoption.
Next steps: the transcript shows the ordinance cleared this reading but the council did not waive the third reading; additional steps or the next reading remain on the calendar per council rules.
